Circular textiles: collected does not mean recycled

There are many steps between a bag of clothes and a new product

Used textiles vary widely in condition and composition. Some can continue to be worn, while others are suitable only for material recovery or further treatment. Appropriate sorting is needed for this. The European Environment Agency warns that additional collection without corresponding sorting and recycling capacity does not automatically lead to greater circularity. Materials may still be exported, incinerated or landfilled. A high collection volume is therefore an important but incomplete indicator. It does not yet reveal what proportion is used again as clothing or processed into a usable secondary raw material. Meaningful reports track subsequent routes and distinguish between reuse, different forms of recycling and final disposal. Only then is it possible to see whether a system actually reduces material losses or merely shifts the place where they occur and are recorded in statistics.

Fibre blends make high-quality material loops more difficult

Textiles often contain several types of fibre, as well as dyes, finishes and additional components. These combinations can provide desirable properties during use but make subsequent separation more difficult. Recycling processes require particular input materials and achieve different levels of quality. Processing a textile into another product is therefore not automatically equivalent to returning it to new clothing. An objective assessment must make clear which primary materials are actually being replaced. The quantity and quality of the collected textiles must also match the available processes. The EEA therefore considers the entire value chain rather than disposal alone. Product design, material information and sorting options are interdependent. Simplistic promises of an indefinitely closed loop overlook the fact that mechanical and chemical processing each involve losses, additional inputs and specific material requirements, and cannot treat every blend in the same way.

Longer use has an effect before recycling

If a garment remains in meaningful use for longer and thereby avoids a new purchase, this can remove the need for additional production. The actual benefit, however, depends on whether the replacement really is avoided. A large second-hand purchase on top of an unchanged number of new products does not automatically conserve resources. The EEA therefore identifies higher quality, longer use, reuse, repair and recycling as interconnected elements of a changed textiles system. Digital services can also support either direction: better matching of used clothing with buyers or additional consumption. For individuals, a pragmatic sequence is helpful: use existing items, consider suitable repairs, pass items on in a targeted way and only then use appropriate collection routes. For manufacturers and retailers, durable design and traceable material pathways remain crucial. Responsibility cannot be shifted entirely onto households' final sorting decisions if products have already been designed in ways that make circularity difficult.

Keep exploring

• Agrivoltaics: two harvests from one area?
• The climate-friendly building material may be the component already there
• Bio-based building materials: renewable origins are only the beginning