Open science gains a shared foundation

What is already in place

The 2021 UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science established the first internationally agreed framework for this field. It defines open science more broadly than free access to articles: research data, methods, collaboration and the participation of other groups in society are also included. The Open Science Outlook, published in 2023, supplemented this framework with a global examination of the current state of open science and developments in the field. This is institutional, documentable progress, but not a globally measured success rate for open research. The distinction matters. A shared definition and a report do not automatically change day-to-day research. They do, however, make it easier to compare goals, identify obstacles and assess progress more systematically in future. The positive news here concerns the infrastructure for shared understanding and monitoring that has been established.

Why openness means more than reading for free

A freely available scholarly article can lower barriers to access. But data, analytical steps and the software used may also be important for understanding and scrutinising a study. Open science therefore focuses on the entire research process. It aims to facilitate collaboration and scrutiny, not merely remove paywalls. At the same time, legitimate limits must be taken into account, for example when protecting sensitive information or considering different rights over knowledge. Openness is therefore not a simple injunction to put everything online without review. UNESCO also emphasises multilingualism and participation beyond established research institutions. This answers a common question: is it enough for an English-language text to be available online free of charge? For genuine access, that is one step, but comprehensibility, technical usability and opportunities to contribute oneself can be just as crucial.

Where ambition and results may diverge

Open publication can create new inequalities if costs are merely shifted from reading to publishing. Maintaining data, reliable archives and clear documentation also requires time and resources. The UNESCO report therefore treats open science as a cultural and organisational change, rather than a single technical switch. The expected benefits, such as better collaboration or reproducibility, are plausible goals, but need to be tested in specific applications. For readers, the value of the shared framework lies in explicitly bringing these questions together. For now, the achievement is a robust starting point: those involved can draw on shared terminology and publicly documented challenges. Whether this leads to more equitable participation will depend on which institutions and people receive the necessary resources and whether openness becomes genuinely usable in everyday practice.

Keep exploring

• One less pollutant in the tank: The worldwide end of leaded petrol for cars
• Humpback whales: a historic conservation success that needs a regional perspective
• More electric cars, less demand for oil: A measurable shift with limits