How dust becomes planets: The difficult steps in between

Dust grains need to do more than collide

Planet formation begins with small solid particles in a gas-rich disc. Under suitable conditions, they can stick together and form larger aggregates. But collisions do not always lead to growth: particles can bounce off one another or break apart. Their interaction with the gas also influences their motion, so material can drift inwards and be lost to later planet-building. A complete explanation must therefore show how solid matter becomes concentrated quickly enough. Pressure maxima and collective processes involving gas and particles are considered important possibilities. Sufficiently dense concentrations can give rise to larger, gravitationally bound bodies. The details depend on local conditions. A simple picture in which clumps of dust grow steadily and uniformly everywhere considerably underestimates these physical hurdles.

Gas giants and rocky planets require different conditions

Once a larger solid body has formed, its gravity can attract further material. For many gas giants to form, a sufficiently massive core must develop before the gas-rich disc disappears. It can then acquire an extensive gaseous envelope. How quickly this happens depends, among other things, on the supply of material and the heat released by the envelope. Rocky planets, by contrast, grow mainly from solid constituents and later collisions between larger bodies. The distinction is not clear-cut: there are numerous intermediate forms between small rocky worlds and gas giants. Different temperatures in the disc also determine which substances can exist as ice. This creates spatial differences in the available building material. A planet’s eventual composition therefore reveals something about the conditions in which it formed, but does not always identify its original birthplace unambiguously.

Why planets do not have to stay where they were born

Young planets interact gravitationally with their disc and with one another. In the process, their orbits can change considerably. This migration helps explain why some large gas planets orbit very close to their stars, even though forming there appears difficult. Later encounters and resonances can also rearrange a system. The architecture observed today is therefore the outcome of an evolutionary process, not necessarily an unchanged reflection of the original disc. Researchers combine disc observations, computer simulations and statistical data from many exoplanets to distinguish between possible pathways. Individual striking systems provide important tests, but cannot replace an overall assessment. Many broad aspects of planet formation are now understood, yet unresolved transitions and competing detailed models remain. This very diversity explains why other planetary systems often resemble our Solar System only in part.

Keep exploring

• ALMA: How radio telescopes see the cold nurseries of stars
• Dark energy: what accelerating expansion really means
• Dark matter: why astronomers infer invisible mass